K Krewer
Senior Research
Scribblor Infinitus
Offline
Posts: 1464
Madame Goldschmidt
|
 |
« on: March 22, 2012, 04:10:14 PM » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
K Krewer
|
|
|
|
rrbeers
|
 |
« Reply #1 on: March 22, 2012, 05:22:15 PM » |
|
Is it the fullness that's throwing it out of 60s for you?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
K Krewer
Senior Research
Scribblor Infinitus
Offline
Posts: 1464
Madame Goldschmidt
|
 |
« Reply #2 on: March 22, 2012, 05:25:17 PM » |
|
No, more the lace and the embroidery. It's hard to articulate, but it just kind of reminds me of a crazy quilt.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
K Krewer
|
|
|
Beth Chamberlain
Scribblor Infinitus
Offline
Posts: 1261
|
 |
« Reply #3 on: March 22, 2012, 05:59:21 PM » |
|
I was debating over that apron last night. The embroidery says 90's to me. The lace is very like what I have on a bunch of baby clothes from 80's/90's. I was going to dig through some books for embroidery designs to see if I was right but haven't gotten to it yet.
Beth
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Men are made in the image of God. Gentlemen are manufactured by tailors, barbers, and bootblacks. Woman is the last and most perfect work of God. Ladies are the productions of silk-worms, milliners
|
|
|
Stephanie Brennan
Scribblor Infinitus
Offline
Posts: 1079
|
 |
« Reply #4 on: March 22, 2012, 06:41:50 PM » |
|
The design is also asymmetrical not typical of Civil War years where most things are balanced. Stephanie
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Colleen
Senior Research
Veteran Scribbler
Offline
Posts: 851
|
 |
« Reply #6 on: March 24, 2012, 08:49:54 AM » |
|
The second one looks later to me, but the first one has the look of some of the earlier aprons. That particular style of embroidery for aprons was popular in the 1840s-1850s. Colleen
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
E L Watkins-Morris
|
 |
« Reply #7 on: March 25, 2012, 06:15:28 AM » |
|
Is this one of those times when the photo chemistry plays tricks on us? The skirt photographed light but is actually in the same value range as the blouse and trim in reality? Liz W.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Materium Superbat Opus-Ovid Simple yet complex...-Mark Baldridge, Art 101: The Principles of Design
|
|
|
|
|
|
MrsPeebles
|
 |
« Reply #9 on: March 26, 2012, 08:52:20 AM » |
|
Neat Ambrotype, it certainly pops that myth that they never wore lace mitts in the 1860s!  Ambrotypes and those style mats seem earlier to me, but I think the bonnet is a dead giveaway for being 1860s.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Mfr, Judith Peebles
BOOKS! The Original Search Engine. Life is short, so read fast. Remember, the words you read today are the words you say tomorrow!
|
|
|
Joanna Jones
Scribblor Infinitus
Offline
Posts: 3736
|
 |
« Reply #10 on: March 26, 2012, 09:22:09 AM » |
|
Hmm.... her collar is so wide - and I thought bonnet decorations on the sides and lace on the top were a 50s thing? And the 60s were the reverse - lace on the sides, and decorations on the top?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Elizabeth
Administrator
Scribblor Infinitus
Offline
Posts: 7533
|
 |
« Reply #11 on: March 26, 2012, 09:24:36 AM » |
|
That ambro hollers 50s to me. She's *so* stylish for it, all the details in place.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Regards, Elizabeth
|
|
|
|
MrsPeebles
|
 |
« Reply #12 on: March 26, 2012, 01:23:31 PM » |
|
Well, I thought the bonnet being so far back on her head was much closer to 1860s?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Mfr, Judith Peebles
BOOKS! The Original Search Engine. Life is short, so read fast. Remember, the words you read today are the words you say tomorrow!
|
|
|
|
|
|